{"id":382883,"date":"2019-05-20T10:37:22","date_gmt":"2019-05-20T10:37:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uniquehot.com\/?p=382883"},"modified":"2024-06-11T13:40:07","modified_gmt":"2024-06-11T13:40:07","slug":"crypto-lawyer-dont-get-too-hyped-about-vanecks-bitcoin-etf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uniquehot.com\/news\/crypto-lawyer-dont-get-too-hyped-about-vanecks-bitcoin-etf\/","title":{"rendered":"Crypto Lawyer: Don’t Get (Too) Hyped About VanEck’s Bitcoin ETF"},"content":{"rendered":"

Over the past few weeks, many in the crypto industry have begun to expect a Bitcoin<\/a> exchange-traded fund (ETF). Don’t ask us why, but in a hive mind-esque fashion, hundreds on Twitter have begun to call for the regulatory approval of such a vehicle, which has the potential to catapult the space to new heights.<\/p>\n

Related Reading: Analyst: Crypto Markets May Be Gearing Up for Massive Surge as Bitcoin Continues Climbing<\/a><\/h6>\n

One lawyer, who specializes in cryptocurrency and blockchain, however, is telling us not to get our hopes up. Jake Chervinsky, as the lawyer formerly of Kobre & Kim is known, broke down his thoughts on the matter in a 17-part Twitter thread<\/a>, which covered the complexities and nuances of this pertinent topic.<\/p>\n

Bitcoin ETF Hype Might Be Unwarranted<\/strong><\/h2>\n

For those who missed the memo, last week, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) dealt a blow to the cryptocurrency space amid the tumultuous price action. A document revealed that the financial regulator delayed its verdict on a Bitcoin ETF application from Bitwise Asset Management,<\/a> exercising its right to extend a self-imposed deadline by an additional 45 days.<\/p>\n

Although this was expected, what was odd was that the regulator didn’t comment a similar proposal from VanEck and SolidX, which was on the chopping block alongside Bitwise’s application. This, as aforementioned, has led to a flurry of rumors about the potential approval of the product, which has been an important subject in 2019.<\/a> Because why would the SEC delay its verdict on Bitwise’s vehicle, but not comment on a seemingly similar product simultaneously?<\/p>\n

Chervinsky says this is semantics. In the thread, he notes that postulating that this staggered issuance of verdicts is positive is nonsensical, and goes on to say that considering the context, “denial is far more likely than approval.”<\/p>\n

\n

0\/ This is no time for ETF hopium. If the SEC doesn't delay the VanEck bitcoin ETF proposal, the most likely result is rejection, not approval.<\/p>\n

The SEC delayed Bitwise last week, but still hasn't made a decision on VanEck. Here's why that's a bad sign for ETF bulls.<\/p>\n

Thread \ud83d\udc47<\/p>\n

— Jake Chervinsky (@jchervinsky) May 19, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n